The Falling of Criminal Liability by Dropping the Inviolability of Self A Comparative Jurisprudential Study

Abstract

This study focuses on examining the legal rulings regarding the occurrence of a crime when it is applied to those deserving it, particularly when the victim is not considered to have the sanctity or inviolability of their blood. This includes cases such as murderers, apostates, and married adulterers, even though their blood is not guaranteed immunity. Acknowledging that the killing of these individuals is considered a crime, despite the lack of guaranteed immunity for their blood, is based on the premise that the study will delve into the execution of the judgment on them occurring without the knowledge or consent of the ruler and before the judgment of the judge. This research is structured into an introduction, two main sections, and a conclusion, as follows: The research commenced with an introductory section that provided a definition, encompassing the significance of the study, its objectives, and a review of previous studies. The first section discussed the entitlements of the relatives of the victim to seek retribution from the perpetrator prior to the issuance of a judicial verdict. The second section addressed the killing of an apostate and an adulterer who is married, before the issuance of a judicial verdict, through the application of punishment. Finally, the conclusion and findings reached by the researcher were presented, accompanied by appendice containing the sources and references used.