Contante Justitie System in Corruption Cases in Indonesia: A Legal Constructivism System Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61707/1rws6923Keywords:
Contante Justitie, Corruption, Indonesia, Legal Constructivism, Constitutional CourtAbstract
The legal consequences of Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 stating that Law Number 31 of 199 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes which is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and specifically deletes the phrase "can" in Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Eradication of the Criminal Act of Corruption Law have a legal impact on the characteristics of the offense. This was normative legal research which uses a statutory and conceptual approach. Results showed that the Financial Audit Board's future arrangements can fulfill the principle of Contante Justitie, namely speeding up the investigative examination process. It was applied by delegating authority from the Central BPK to the Regional BPK Representative auditors so that the latter have independent investigative audit authority to speed up the investigative Audit Result Report process in handling corruption to fulfill the legal system constructivism concept.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0