Assessing the Benefits of Judicial Review Without Ordinary Legal Actions in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61707/vhfy6081Keywords:
Criminal, Legal Effort, Judicial ReviewAbstract
General PK applications are submitted if a mistake is a natural law or mistake because it covers coverage. Opinions and considerations: anything inside a decision can be considered a mistake or an honest mistake without limit. The convict can submit effort PK law without effort law normal because the verdict No can surpass the decision beginning. Carrying out effort PK law without effort law is regular and profitable. This research is normative legal research. Regarding the normative study, there are several approaches, including approach legislation ( statute approach ), approach concept ( conceptual approach ), approach analytical ( analytical approach), approach case ( case approach), and comparative approach ( comparative approach ). Legal materials are processed deductively, concluding a general problem regarding the concrete situation. Furthermore, the existing legal materials are analyzed to see issues related to the effectiveness of current and future implementation, PK based on errors or mistakes real action without prior ordinary legal action is often filed by convicts because There is a principle that the punishment imposed in the PK cannot exceed the original decision, even though the Supreme Court decision still does There is something different opinion related matter the.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0