Unicameral And Bicameral Parliaments: Their Advantages, Disadvantages, And Functionality

Authors

  • Vait Qerimi Professor at the 'Marin Barleti' High School – Gjilan
  • Naser Pajaziti Notary Public at Kosova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61707/wzgm0533

Keywords:

Parliamentary System, Unicameral, Bicameral, Advantages and Disadvantages, Political Stability, Functionality, Representation

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze unicameral and bicameral parliamentary systems by exploring their advantages, disadvantages, and functionality. The parliamentary system is a key component of any democratic state, and its structure can significantly influence the efficiency and stability of political decision-making. A unicameral parliament, which represents a single legislative chamber, has the advantage of quicker decision-making and a more direct connection with the people, but it may be exposed to domination by certain political groups. On the other hand, the bicameral parliamentary system, which includes two legislative chambers, provides more detailed control over legislation but can be slower and more complex in decision-making processes. This paper will examine these systems in the context of political stability and the effectiveness of democracy, including examples from countries that use these parliamentary structures, such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and the United States. The analysis will also focus on the impact of these systems on legislative processes, the balance of power, and political representation, offering a comprehensive overview of the functionality of unicameral and bicameral parliaments in politics. 

Downloads

Published

2024-12-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Unicameral And Bicameral Parliaments: Their Advantages, Disadvantages, And Functionality. (2024). International Journal of Religion, 5(12), 1838 – 1844. https://doi.org/10.61707/wzgm0533

Similar Articles

21-30 of 599

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.